Donate 4 Life

Home > Newsroom > Thrive On-Line > Thrive Archive > Spring, 2008, Thrive

Research Round-Up

Supplements Used Widely By Cancer Survivors Despite Risks, Studies Show clinical trial

A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology showed that cancer patients and survivors are more likely than the general American population to use vitamin and mineral supplements, despite potential risks. The study, conducted by researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, reviewed 32 studies on supplement use among adult cancer patients and survivors between 1999 and 2006. It found that between 64 percent and 81 percent of survivors reported using supplements, as compared with 50 percent of the general population.

"People think if a little is good, a lot is better, and that's plain not true. It can be worse," said Dean Brenner, M.D., a U-M professor of internal medicine and pharmacology who was not involved in the study.

Brenner cited a study showing that certain doses of beta-carotene supplements actually increased cancer risk rather than decreasing it.

The Hutchinson study showed that between 14 percent and 32 percent of cancer survivors started taking supplements after diagnosis. Women, people with higher levels of education and breast cancer survivors were more likely to use supplements.

In addition, between 26 percent and 77 percent of cancer survivors reported using multivitamins, compared with one-third of the general population. Brenner said using a multivitamin won't hurt, but that most people can get the vitamins and minerals they need by eating a balanced diet. Most people do not need more nutrients than the Recommended Dietary Allowance, guidelines established by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help people develop nutritional goals.

"All you have to do is go into a so-called health food store to see the huge amounts of formulated materials with outrageous claims. Our researchers took a field trip recently to one, and we just shook our heads and said, 'Where do these claims come from?'" Brenner said. There is no evidence that there is any benefit to taking anything beyond the RDA. Individuals with requirements exceeding the RDA should be evaluated and cared for by a competent physician."

Related Resources

View the original abstract from the Journal of Clinical Oncology or a press release on the study from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Few breast cancer surgeons discuss reconstruction options, U-M study finds
The researchers found that younger and more educated women were more likely to discuss reconstruction with their surgeon-and that this discussion significantly affected a woman's treatment decision.

Only a third of patients with breast cancer discussed reconstruction options with their surgeons before their initial surgeries, according to a recent U-M Cancer Center study in the journal Cancer. What's more, women who did discuss reconstruction up front were four times more likely to have a mastectomy.

"For women who have the option of either a lumpectomy or a mastectomy, long-term outcomes are the same regardless of which surgery a woman chooses. But that choice could have significant impact on a woman's quality of life, sexuality and body image. It's important for women to understand all of their surgical options -- including breast reconstruction -- so they can make the best choice for themselves," said study author Amy Alderman, M.D., M.P.H., assistant professor of plastic surgery at the U-M Medical School.

The study looked at 1,178 women from the Detroit and Los Angeles metropolitan areas who had undergone surgery for breast cancer. Patients were contacted about three months after diagnosis and were asked whether they had discussed breast reconstruction with their surgeon before their surgery. Patients were also asked whether knowing about reconstruction options affected their decision.

Breast reconstruction can be performed immediately after a mastectomy, which removes the entire breast. This type of reconstruction leads to better aesthetic outcomes and psychological benefits for the patient, compared to delayed reconstruction, previous studies have shown.

"To many women, breast reconstruction is a symbol of hope that they can get past this cancer diagnosis. Reconstruction is not necessarily the right option for every woman and not everyone is going to choose reconstruction, but I think it's important that every woman is informed of what the benefits of reconstruction can be for their physical and emotional well-being," Alderman said.

Related Resources

View the U-M press release or the original abstract from the journal Cancer.

Tell us what you think.

What kinds of stories would you like to reading in Thrive? What type of advice do you think would be helpful? Do you have tips for other patients or caregivers? Let us know. Email us at ThriveMagazine@med.umich.edu.

return to the top of the page


Small Text SizeMedium Text SizeLarge Text Size
Adjust text size

Speak with a Cancer nurse: 1-800-865-1125
make a donation

Check It Out
Find out what's going on in the Patient & Family Center this month.