Home > Newsroom
> Publications>
News Archive
Please note: This article is part of the Cancer Center's News Archive and is here for historical
purposes. The information and links may no longer be up-to-date.
Herceptin: An Example of the Success of Translational Research
-Anne F. Schott, M.D.,
Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine
-Stephen P. Ethier, Ph.D.,
Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology
Associate Director, Breast Oncology Program
Those of
us who see breast cancer patients in clinical practice can
attest to the high level of public interest and awareness
in the new cancer therapy trastuzumab (Herceptin®). The interest
was fueled initially by the intense media coverage of the
American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in May 1998,
where the results of the Phase III trials with trastuzumab
were released in abstract form. The fire was stoked by the
continuing media coverage of the FDA approval process and
by the action of patient advocate groups in accelerating approval.
The drug became available to clinicians in early October,
although the pivotal Phase III trial has not yet been published.
This article will review the molecular basis for the development
of this new therapy and some results of published (and unpublished)
clinical trials with trastuzumab.
HER2 and Cancer
Growth factors and their receptors are known to play critical
roles in cell development, growth and differentiation. Many
receptors possess intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity that
is activated upon the receptor's interaction with its ligand.
Abnormal expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor
2 (HER-2) is frequently observed in a number of primary tumors,
suggesting that the overexpression of this growth factor receptor
may contribute to transformation and tumorigenesis (Figure
1). In most cases, HER-2 protein overexpression is the
result of gene amplification, and overexpression has been
correlated with poor clinical outcome in patients with breast
and ovarian cancers (1). Laboratory data have demonstrated
that overexpression of HER-2 is sufficient to stimulate the
tyrosine kinase activity of this receptor. Furthermore, high-level
activation of the HER-2 kinase results in the activation of
downstream signaling molecules, such as the MAP kinases and
the PI 3/Akt kinases, which both drive proliferation and inhibit
apoptosis of the cells.
Approximately 25% to 30% of patients with breast and ovarian
cancers overexpress HER-2 (1). Similar associations may exist
for lung adenocarcinoma and gastric cancers. These data encourage
the exploitation of HER-2 as a potential target for cancer
therapy.
muMAb 4D5
Murine monoclonal antibodies (muMAbs) were produced against
the extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor to inhibit the
proliferation of human tumor cells overexpressing p185HER2.
The most encouraging results were obtained with muMAb 4D5,
which produced significant anti-proliferative effects both
in vitro and in vivo against human breast cancer that overexpresses
the HER2 receptor (2). Trastuzumab, the humanized version
of muMAb 4D5, was engineered by inserting the complementary-determining
regions (CDRs) of muMAb 4D5 into the framework of a consensus
human IgG1. Trastuzumab is comparable to muMAb 4D5 in blocking
breast tumor cell proliferation; however, unlike muMAb 4D5,
it induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against
tumor cell lines in the presence of human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells. In addition, the humanized form of the
antibody prevents or reduces the generation of an immune response
directed against the antibody itself.
Clinical Studies of Trastuzumab
The clinical benefit of trastuzumab in women with metastatic
breast cancer has been demonstrated by the results of two
recent Phase III studies. A large randomized, controlled Phase
III trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
trastuzumab with first-line chemotherapy (anthracycline plus
cyclophosphamide, or paclitaxel) compared with chemotherapy
alone, was recently completed in women with metastatic breast
cancer (3). This study of 469 patients with HER-2 overexpressing
tumors who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease
demonstrated that the combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy
significantly prolongs the time to disease progression compared
with chemotherapy alone (Table 1). The
median time to disease progression for all enrolled patients
who received trastuzumab plus chemotherapy was 7.2 months.
The median time to disease progression for all enrolled patients
who received chemotherapy alone was 4.5 months. Thus, the
addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy extended the median
time to progression by 2.7 months. The difference between
the overall time to disease progression for the two treatment
groups was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The second
study enrolled 222 patients with refractory metastatic breast
cancer (4). The overall response rate for all 222 patients
was 15% (95% CI 11, 21). There were 8 complete responses and
26 partial responses. The median duration of response was
9.1 months. Thus, trastuzumab has some activity as a single
agent in women with metastatic breast cancer who have HER-2
overexpressing tumors.
Assessments of adverse events in these two studies indicated
that several women developed signs and symptoms of cardiac
dysfunction while receiving trastuzumab. The risk of cardiac
dysfunction was highest in patients who received trastuzumab
co-administered with anthracycline-based chemotherapy (Table
2), and the risk may have been influenced by increasing
age. The nature of the observed cardiac dysfunction was similar
to the syndrome of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, and
the signs and symptoms of cardiac dysfunction usually responded
to treatment. Other adverse events observed in these two studies
were generally mild to moderate in severity.
Summary
Trastuzumab (Herceptin®) was approved on September 25, 1998,
for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have
tumors that overexpress the HER-2 protein. It is indicated
for treatment of patients both as first-line therapy in combination
with paclitaxel, and as a single agent in second- and third-line
therapy. Due to the increased incidence of cardiac toxicity,
it is recommended that left ventricular function be evaluated
in all patients prior to and during treatment with trastuzumab.
This is an exciting time to be in the field of oncology. Trastuzumab
is the first of hopefully many therapies that will target
specific genetic alterations that contribute to the malignant
progression of cancer. Although trastuzumab may benefit only
a small subset of all cancer patients, the development of
this drug is proof of the principle that discoveries in the
basic science laboratory can be translated into promising
cancer treatments.
References
- Slamon DJ, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu protooncogene
in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 244(4905):707-12,
1989.
- Hudziak R, et al. p185HER2 monoclonal antibody has anti-proliferative
effects in vitro and sensitizes human breast tumor cells
to tumor necrosis factor. Mol Cell Biol. 9:1165-72, 1989.
- Slamon D, et al. Addition of Herceptin (humanized anti-HER2
antibody) to first line chemotherapy for HER2 overexpressing
metastatic breast cancer markedly increases anticancer activity:
a randomized, multinational controlled Phase III trial.
Proc of ASCO #377, 17:98A, 1998.
- Cobleigh M, et al. Efficacy and safety of Herceptin (humanized
anti-HER2 antibody) as a single agent in 222 women with
HER2 overexpression who relapsed following chemotherapy
for metastatic breast cancer. Proc of ASCO #376, 17: 97A,
1998.
Return to top
Figure One
Return to top
Table 1.
Phase III Clinical Efficacy in First-Line Treatment
| |
Combined Results |
Paclitaxel Subgroup |
AC Subgroup |
| |
Trastuzumab+ ll Chemotherapy
(n=235) |
All hemotherapy
(n=234) |
Trastuzumab+
Paclitaxel (n=92) |
Paclitaxel (n=96) |
Trastuzumab+ Ca
(n=143) |
AC
(n=138) |
Primary Endpoint Time
to Progression b,c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Median (months) |
7.2 |
4.5 |
6.7 |
2.5 |
7.6 |
5.7 |
95% confidence interval |
6.9, 8.6 |
4.0, 4.8 |
5.3, 9.9 |
2.0, 4.3 |
7.2, 9.4 |
4.6, 7.1 |
| p-value (log rank) |
<0.0001 |
|
<0.0001 |
|
<0.001 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Endpoints
Overall Response Rate b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rate (percent) |
45 |
29 |
38 |
15 |
50 |
38 |
| 95% confidence interval |
37, 50 |
23, 34 |
26, 46 |
7, 22 |
41, 57 |
30, 46 |
| p-value (x2(-test)) |
<0.001 |
|
0.001 |
|
0.10 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Duration of Response b,c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Median (months) |
9.1 |
5.8 |
8.3 |
4.3 |
9.1 |
6.4 |
| 25%, 75% quantile |
5.5, 14.9 |
3.9, 8.5 |
4.9, 11.0 |
3.7, 7.4 |
5.8, 14.9 |
4.5, 8.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-Year Survival c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percent alive |
79 |
68 |
73 |
61 |
83 |
73 |
| 95% confidence interval |
74, 84 |
62, 74 |
66, 80 |
51, 71 |
77, 89 |
66, 82 |
| p-value (Z-test) |
<0.01 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.04 |
|
(a) AC= anthracycline (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
(b) Assessed by an independent Response Evaluation Committee
(c) Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Return to top
Table 2.
Incidence and Severity of Cardiac Dysfunction
| |
Trastuzumab a alone
n=213 |
Trastuzumab b + Paclitaxel b
n=91 |
Paclitaxel b
n=95 |
Anthracycline + cyclophosphamide b
n=143 |
Trastuzuma b + Anthracycline + cyclophosphamide
b
n=135 |
| Any Cardiac Dysfunction |
7% |
12% |
1% |
7% |
27% |
| Class III-IV |
5% |
4% |
1% |
3% |
19% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Open-label, single-agent Phase 2 study (94% received
prior anthracyclines).
(b) Randomized Phase III study comparing chemotherapy plus
trastuzumab to chemotherapy alone, where chemotherapy is either
anthracycline/cyclophophamide or paclitaxel.
Return to top